published by WISE/NIRS Nuclear Monitor on January 11, 2002

Sweden: Barsebäck-2 closure postponed


Swedish legislators have decided that Barsebäck-2 need not close by 1 July 2002, but say that closure should be possible before the end of 2003. Meanwhile, all the fuel has now been removed from Barsebäck-1, which was shut down in 30 November 1999, and plans are being drawn up for its decommissioning.

(560.5361) WISE Amsterdam - The closure of Barsebäck-1 was a great victory for the anti-nuclear movement. The Swedish people voted in a 1980 referendum to phase out nuclear power, but it was not until 1999 that Barsebäck-1 became the first reactor to be shut down under this phaseout (see WISE News Communique 514.5050, " Sweden's phase-out: Reality at last?" and 522, "In Brief"). The Swedish phaseout of nuclear energy is still on the cards but the last reactor closure date of 2010 was dropped in a 1997 energy revision by Parliament.

IT'S TIME TO HELP OUR FINNISH FRIENDS!

Finland's coalition government is sharply divided over a plan to build a new nuclear power plant, but will most likely decide in favor in the week of 14 - 21 January. Parliament could vote on the controversial issue by summer.
Finland is the only country in Western Europe considering an increase in nuclear energy capacity. Finland now has four nuclear reactors at two installations accounting for about 30 percent of the country's total electricity consumption.

According to Greenpeace Finland nine of Finland's 18 cabinet members support the proposal, while five oppose it, and four ministers are still undecided. The application needs a majority of support in the Cabinet before it can go to parliament.
It would be the first time in the world that a coalition government including a Green Party decides to build a new nuclear power station.
Among the possible suppliers of a new plant are Westinghouse Atom, GE, Siemens, Framatome and Atomstroyexport (Russia).
Environmental NGO's in the country believe there is still a chance the parliament will reject the proposal, but it will be a close fight. Contact Greenpeace Finland if you want to help.
Sources: Reuters, 10 January 2002; phone call with Harri Lammi of Greenpeace Finaland, 10 January 2002
Contact: Greenpeace Finland, Aurorankatu 11 a 2, 00100 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 9 431 571 35; Mobile +358 50 383 1822

Barsebäck is only 20 kilometers from Copenhagen in Denmark, and the Danish anti-nuclear organization OOA had run a campaign over many years to shut both Barsebäck reactors. After Denmark had decided not to build any nuclear power stations, and Barsebäck's shutdown was confirmed, OOA wound itself up, its mission accomplished. OOA was responsible for the "Smiling Sun" badges, whose sales enabled the WISE network to be set up back in 1977 (see WISE News Communique 499-500).

For Barsebäck-2 the situation is less clear. When the Swedish parliament decided to retract the order to close the reactor by 1 July 2002, no replacement closure date was specified. Instead, there will be a review of Sweden's energy needs and the closure date of Barsebäck-2 will be set based upon the outcome of the review.

The closure date has been repeatedly postponed, and although the parliament has now said that closure should be possible by the end of 2003, this is only a recommendation. Likewise, the conditions that the parliament set for the reactor's closure - sufficient domestic electricity supply to meet Sweden's needs, a guarantee that electricity prices will not increase because of the shutdown and assurance of no negative environmental effects - are not binding on the government. The loss-making reactor continues to operate while the government prevaricates (see WISE News Communique 545.5259, " 'Yes-and-No' - A winning strategy to preserve Sweden's nuclear industry?").

Meanwhile, according to industry journal Nucleonics Week, the morale of Barsebäck workers is low after the closure of the first reactor, which they had nicknamed "Sofia". The final "spent" fuel assemblies were loaded onto the transport ship M/S Sigyn in December 2001, and operators must come to terms with the fact that the reactor has now been shut down for good. They consider it unjust that the reactor was shut down after 26 years' operation when utilities in many countries hope to run their reactors for 40 years or more.

They must also make plans for decommissioning Barsebäck. Staff have already visited Chernobyl, Greifswald in eastern Germany and Ignalina in Lithuania in order to see how other countries decommission old reactors. However, further plans to visit German reactors have been cancelled following the 11 September terrorist attacks in the USA.

Source: Nucleonics Week, 13 December 2001
Contact: WISE Stockholm


- | -
-
    home > newsletter > search > about us > links > back to contents    
-
- - -