During the not-so-exciting latest round of negotiations on the Kyoto
protocols, that took place in Bonn, Germany, in late October/beginning of November, the nuclear
industry again took the opportunity to lobby their case.
(521.5115) WISE Amsterdam - At the COP 5 meeting in Bonn, industrial groups and
representatives of the "Young Nuclear Generation" group where joined by a few country delegations
in their effort to persuade the negotiators that nuclear is one of the solutions in the struggle
against the greenhouse effect. Not suprisingly it was mainly nuclear-exporting countries that are
trying to get the sales of nuclear reactors to be accounted for under the rules of Joint
Implementation; Canada (selling Candus to Southeast Asia), Japan (trying to sell reactors to others
in the region) and South Africa (willing to build a new generation of nuclear reactors--the PBMR--
but most probably only if they can sell them to other (African) countries).
Although up till now there is no majority ready to accept "clean air credits" for nuclear reactors
built elsewhere, most pro-nuclear countries are quite optimistic. They won't be stressing the issue
too much because "soon as it is mentioned there will be a huge negative reaction", according to an
Asian delegate.
Canada, for instance, won't be openly advocating nuclear power too often. The Canadian government
was advised by nuclear advocates who believe that nuclear energy would be included in the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) if it is not specifically mentioned. And this is, according to Mr.
Koike, a diplomate working for the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the strategy of the Japan:
"The CDM is there to assist developing countries in their goal of sustainable development, so it
should be up to the host country to determine what sustainable development is." Never knew the
Japanese government and industry where so concerned with the will and destiny of developing
countries"
Biggest threat for environmentalists will be that the issue will not be decided on in an
internationally binding protocol. This would leave the choice to individual countries, either
exporters of nuclear reactors and/or receivers. Vietnam for instance, a country which has been
pleading for a nuclear power station over the last thirty years, is very eager to finally fullfill
its wish, Canada would probably be willing to almost give-away-for-free a CANDU, because they need
to show that the CANDU is still wanted.
Sources:
- CBC News, 11 October
- Nucleonics Week, 4 November
- Private talks with S. Schöne, head of the climate policy unit of WWF Netherlands.
Contact: Climate Action Network
44 rue du Taciturne, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Tel: +32-2-2310180
Fax: +32-2-2305713
E-mail:
info@climnet.org