published by WISE News Communique on August 27, 1999

Paducah update: Workers also contaminated with PU at Oak Ridge


Promising to "leave no stone unturned," the US Department of Energy has launched an investigation to examine whether the uranium enrichment facility at Paduca callously caused harm to the environment and its workers. However, results are not to be expected before November. Meanwhile, Paducah's sister plant at Oak Ridge came under strong suspicion.

(516.5065) WISE Amsterdam - As more and more information comes to light about the plutonium exposure at Paducah (and its sister plant in Oak Ridge too), the evidence mounts. The exhumed bones of a long-dead uranium worker have given a powerful boost to current employees' claims of dangerous exposures. The long-overlooked medical evidence from the case of Joseph Harding suggests that for some workers radiation doses at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant were far higher than previously believed, and may have been dozens of times above federal limits, according to one analysis of the data. The results of Harding's posthumous tests, conducted as part of a lawsuit in 1983 but never publicized, offer the strongest corroboration to date of hazardous conditions where workers labored for decades in a haze of radioactive dust that was sometimes laced with deadly plutonium. "Uranium content of the bone was far in excess of normal expectations," wrote Alice Stewart, an internationally known British researcher who reviewed the results of laboratory tests of Harding's remains for his estate. "The terminal finding overrules all earlier impressions (from U.S. government officials) of NO internal depositions of uranium."
Moreover, the type of uranium found was "not from natural sources", and apparently came from the plant's uranium enrichment process, the report said. Because uranium is slowly purged by the body over time, the levels in Harding's bones would have been "several-fold higher" during the time he was employed, the lab report stated.
Exactly how much higher is unclear. But Carl Johnson, a Colo- rado physician and radiation consultant who analyzed the test results for Harding's widow in 1983, said Harding's uranium "bone burden" in the 1970s would have been between 1,700 and 34,000 times higher than normal. Based on those levels, the annual radiation dose to Harding's bone tissue would have been 30 to 600 rems a year. Under current standards, US nuclear industry workers are allowed a maximum full-body dose of 5 rems a year.

The hazards for uranium workers are further underscored by unpublished research from a sister plant in Tennessee. A draft study of workers at the K-25 plant in Oak Ridge shows unusually high death rates for former uranium workers, as well as sharply higher rates of lung and bone cancers. The draft mortality study of about 11,000 former workers at the plant was conducted by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Although the research essentially was completed in 1994, funding for the study was dropped before it could be peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal. The draft report, obtained by The Post, shows higher rates of death for all causes among former workers, a finding that is significant in itself, given that government workers are typically healthier than the general population because of higher salaries and access to health care.
The study also shows higher rates of cancers of the lung (19 percent) and bone (82 percent) among white male workers compared with the general population. Both cancers are sometimes linked to radiation exposure. Researchers point to several factors that could have skewed the results, including the inclusion in the survey of a sample of thousands of people who worked at the K-25 plant for a relatively brief period during World War II. Since many able-bodied men were in the military during that period, the remaining work force may have been less healthy than the general population, the authors said.

Contaminated uranium containing traces of plutonium and other radioactive isotopes was also fed into the uranium processing systems at the Oak Ridge K-25 site during the 1950s and -60s. However, according to the DOE figures, the amount of contaminated uranium used at Oak Ridge - about 40,000 tons - was less than the 161,000 tons at Paducah. The K-25 material may have been less contaminated because it had already been converted to uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at Paducah before it was sent to Oak Ridge. K-25 also received uranmnium in the form of yellow cake which was processed into UF6 at feed plants at the site. Another source of feed was the uranium contained in spent fuel from the DOE's plutonium reactors. According to the DOE this uranium came to the plants slightly contaminated with radionuclides that include technetium, plutonium, neptunium and americium.

Both the Paducah and K-25 plants were owned by the federal government and operated by the same group of corporate contractors: Union Carbide from the 1950s to the early 1980s, followed by Martin Marietta and Lockheed Martin Corp.
The latter two are the targets of a lawsuit filed by a group of current employees who alleged unsafe working conditions and environmental contamination. Former workers also have alleged that radiation monitoring equipment at the Paducah plant was defective; in some cases, they say, "film" badges used to monitor exposures contained no film.

Sources:

Contact: The Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER)
6935 Laurel Avenue, Suite 204, Takoma Park, MD 20912 USA.
Tel: +1-301-270-5500;
Fax: +1-301-270-3029 E-mail: ieer@ieer.org
- | -
-
    home > newsletter > search > about us > links > back to contents    
-
- - -