The first reactor ever to generate (a modest amount of) electricity was a Fast Breeder Reactor
(FBR) in Idaho, US. It went into operation in December 1951.
1 In spite
of more than four decades of experience with FBRs, the option has proved to be a complete failure.
Only in the very long term are FBRs seen by an optimistic nuclear industry as a commercially viable
option. Japan plans to build FBRs again around 2030.
2 By now 13 FBRs
have been closed worldwide. Only 10 FBRs remain, five of which are more or less regularly
functioning. The other five are being repaired (Monju, Phenix) or rebuilt (Superphenix) or in hot
standby, such as the FFTF. Three FBRs are little pilot plants: the FBTR in India, the Japanese Joyo
and the EBR-2 in the US.
The FBRs were the first to use MOX fuel, except the Russian FBRs which use High Enriched
Uranium. The share of plutonium in FBR MOX however is much higher: about 35% against 4-8% plutonium
in LWR MOX fuel and the whole core is MOX fuel as in LWR only one-third of the core contains MOX
fuel.
Table 3.1 Present Fast Breeder Reactors
3
* Still closed after sodium-fire on 8 December 1995
** Put in hot standby in 1992 4
By the end of 1997 there will be four commercial fuel fabrication plants in the world for the
production of MOX for Light Water Reactors. These four are:
- The Sellafield plant (SMP), England, with a production capacity of 120 ton MOX fuel/year, will
start operation at the end 1997;5
- the Complexe de Fabrication des Combustibles Cadarache (CFCa) in France with an annual capacity
of 15 tons.6 The CFCa plant, owned by Cogema, was first meant to
produce fuel for the fast breeders Rhapsodie, Phenix and Superphenix but has been rebuild for the
fabrication of LWR MOX.7
- Etablissement Melox at Marcoule (France) with an annual capacity of 120 tons; increase is
planned to a capacity of 160-200 tons after the year 2001.8
- the Belgonucléaire Usine de Fabrication d'Eléments Plutonium (P0) at Dessel,
Belgium, with 35 tons/year started in 1973.9
So including the British MDF, the total capacity worldwide by 1998 to produce MOX fuel for Light
Water Reactors would be roughly 313 tons per year. Expansion of the plants at Cadarache, Melox and
Dessel are foreseen. The estimated world MOX fuel production in the year 2000 will be about 350
tons/year. Assuming a plutonium content of 6% in the MOX fuel, the quantity re-used plutonium in
the year 2000 will be 21,000 kg. This capacity is far too short considering the annual amount of
33,400-kg of plutonium being separated at reprocessing plants. Let alone the US and Russian weapons
plutonium if they ever decide to use it as MOX fuel.
Table 3.2 Current and planned largescale LWR MOX fuel production
plants
| Country |
Plant |
Prod.Cap. (ton/yr) |
Prod. 1996 |
Start up |
| Belgium |
Dessel |
35 |
35 |
1973 |
| UK |
MDF |
8 |
8 |
1993 |
| SMP |
120 |
- |
1998 |
| France |
CfCa |
30 |
24 |
1989 |
| Melox |
120 |
58 |
1995 |
| Total |
313 |
125 |
LWRs are designed to use enriched uranium as fuel. In order to use MOX fuel, the reactors have to
be adapted and relicensed. An average of 30% of the uranium fuel in the core is replaced with MOX.
It is important to maintain as much as possible the behavior in the reactor as with a non-MOXed
fuel.
Worldwide there are about 23 LWRs using MOX fuel: in Belgium, France, Germany, India and
Switzerland. Most of those are Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs). Currently only four BWRs
(Gundremmingen and Tarapur) are using MOX. There are only limited expectations and plans for MOX
use in Boiling Water Reactors.
12
Table 3.3 Reactors with MOX-fuel (as of 31-12-96)
*
| Country |
Reactor name |
% Pu in MOX |
MOX use since |
| Belgium |
Tihange-2 |
7.5 |
3/1995 |
| Doel-3 |
7.5 |
5/1995 |
| France |
St. Laurent B1 |
5.3 |
1987 |
| St. Laurent B2 |
5.3 |
1988 |
| Gravelines-3 |
5.3 |
1989 |
| Gravelines-4 |
5.3 |
1989 |
| Dampierre-1 |
5.3 |
1990 |
| Dampierre-2 |
5.3 |
1993 |
| Blayais-2 |
5.3 |
1994 |
| Tricastin-4 |
5.3 |
1996 |
| Tricastin-? |
|
1996 |
| Germany |
Grafenrheinfeld |
|
1986 |
| Brokdorf |
|
1992 |
| Grohnde |
|
1986 |
| Neckar 1 |
|
1985 |
| Phillipsburg 2 |
|
1984 |
| Unterweser |
|
1985 |
| Gundremmingen B |
|
1995 |
| Gundremmingen C |
|
1995 |
| India |
Tarapur 1 |
5 |
1994 |
| Tarapur 2 |
|
1995 |
| Switzerland |
Beznau-1 |
|
1978 |
| Beznau-2 |
|
1984 |
* Sources: see the Country Reports in
Chapter
4.
Sources:
1.
Ruiter, W.de, B.vd Sijde; 'De Nuclear Erfenis',
Boom, 1985, p.113
2.
Nucleonics Week, 27 February 1997: 'Japan utilities plan to burn
MOX in up to 18 LWRs by 2010', p.3
3.
Albright, D., F.Berkhout, W.Walker; 'World Inventory of Plutonium
and Highly Enriched Uranium 1992', Oxford University Press, 1993, p.120
4.
Nuclear Fuel, 27 January 1997: 'FFTF saved from scrap heap but
long-term use still clouded', p.14
5.
Nuclear Fuel, 8 April 1996; 'BNFL wants to be leading player in
disposal of weapons plutonium', p.12
6.
Nuclear Fuel, 18 November 1996, 'Cogema begins fabricating MOX fuel
at Cadarache for German reactors', p.12
7.
Revue Generale Nucleaire, January/February 1995: 'Le combustible
MOX et l'usine de fabrication Melox'
8.
Nuclear Fuel, 18 November 1996: 'Cogema outlines firm plans to
raise MOX production capacity', p.1
9.
Nuclear Fuel, 18 November 1996: 'Belgonucleaire fabricating MOX
fuel for second Swiss reactor', p.13
10.
Nuclear Fuel, 10 March 1997: 'ComEd set back by its position on
European MOX fabrication', p.10
11.
Nuclear Fuel, 10 March 97: `MELOX plant shy of 1996 production
goal', p.11
12.
NEA Newsletter, Spring 1996: 'Plutonium recycling',
p.10